MemSafeEval Part 1: A Bottom-Up Classification of Memory Safety Vulnerabilities in C and C++
Why frontier LLMs fail at vulnerability classification—and what it reveals about CWE labels
Stop fixing the same C/C++ security bugs over and over.
We analyze your codebase's vulnerability history, identify the bug families that keep recurring, and build detectors to catch them before they ship. Every finding backed by a concrete witness.
How It Works
01
Historical Vulnerability Analysis
We examine your codebase's issue history and build each vulnerability against its historical commit to reproduce the conditions that caused it.
02
Bug Family Classification
Individual vulnerabilities are grouped into structural families (the same root cause recurring across files and versions). You see which patterns account for the majority of your severe findings.
03
Detector Development & Validation
For each family, we build static analysis detectors and validate them by testing against historical vulnerable and fixed code. No witness, no finding.
What makes this different
Most static analysis tools generate hundreds of alerts with no evidence that any of them represent a real, exploitable bug. We take the opposite approach: every finding in a Vartia report is backed by a concrete witness (a static analysis detector hit confirmed against historical code, a sanitizer trace, or a proof-of-concept crash reproduction). If we can't produce a witness, we don't report it.
Research & Analysis
No matching items